13 Finalists Announced for the 2025 World Future Policy Award—Including ELC-Supported National Legislation on Rights of Nature in Panama

Press Release

Media Contact: ELC Latin America Legal Program Director Constanza Prieto-Figelist

cpfigelist@earthlaw.org • (202) 621-3877

Photo credit: Ayaita, CC BY-SA 3.0

View of the town of Boquete and the Caldera River, Chiriquí Province, Panama.

Panama’s Law 287 on the Rights of Nature has been named one of the 13 finalists for the World Future Policy Award 2025.

Through this law, Panama became only the third country in Latin America to legislatively recognize the Rights of Nature and its intrinsic value, granting Nature the legal rights to exist, regenerate, and thrive. This landmark legislation sets a powerful global precedent for ecological justice and inspires other nations to follow.

The World Future Policy Award (WFPA), established in 2009, is the world’s leading prize for policy solutions. This year, the WFPA honors exemplary policies that foster and enable a paradigm shift in the way we treat and respect Nature—the foundation of all life. Being selected as one of only 13 finalists is a powerful recognition of Panama’s visionary leadership.

Earth Law Center is honored to have supported the development of this transformative law, a testament to Panama’s global leadership and to the growing movement toward a future where humanity and Nature thrive together.

Please read on for World Future Policy Award’s press release on this year’s finalists:

Policies from around the world showcase pioneering approaches to living in harmony with nature and safeguarding future generations.

Hamburg, 23 September 2025 – The World Future Council today revealed the 13 policy finalists competing for the 2025 World Future Policy Award, which honours laws and policy frameworks that safeguard Nature and the rights of future generations.

The World Future Policy Award (WFPA), established in 2009, is the world’s leading prize for policy solutions. This year, the WFPA recognises exemplary policies that foster and enable a paradigm shift in policy making in the way we treat and respect Nature – the foundation of all life. 

Forty-one nominations from 21 countries were received, from which 13 finalists were selected. These laws have developed holistic solutions that go beyond the protection of nature and thus enable life in harmony with nature. The laws make an outstanding contribution to the well-being of present and future generations of all living beings on Earth. 

The 13 Finalists are

National/regional legislations

• Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act (2017)

• Austria: Environmental Ombudsoffice of Tyrol (Tiroler Umweltanwaltschaft), (1991/2005)

• Bhutan: Biodiversity Act (2022)

• Japan: Basic Act on Biodiversity (2008)

• Norway: Nature Diversity Act (2009)

• Panama: Law 287, which recognises the Rights of Nature and the related obligations of the State with these rights (2022)

• South Africa: National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (NEM:BA) (2004)

• Spain: Law 19/2022 Granting Mar Menor and its basin status of a legal person (2022)

• Uganda: The National Environment Act (2019)

• United Arab Emirates: Federal Law No. 24 of 1999 on the Protection and Development of the Environment, (1999)

Global/international frameworks

• European Union: Nature Restoration Law (EU Regulation) (2024)

• International: BBNJ – Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction (2023)

• International: Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework GBF (2022)

More detailed information on the finalists can be found at the end of this document.

“Since 2009, the World Future Council has honoured policies that tackle the world’s most pressing challenges,” said Neshan Gunasekera, CEO of the World Future Council. “This year’s theme goes beyond urgent. It is existential. To safeguard life on Earth, decision-making must embrace principles of Earth trusteeship, inspired by Indigenous wisdom such as the Kaitiakitanga from the Māori world view and other knowledge systems. We are delighted to see how this year’s finalists are putting these into action.”

The 2025 Award is presented by the World Future Council in partnership with the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). Winners will be announced at a high-level ceremony during the IUCN World Conservation Congress in Abu Dhabi in October 2025.

Media Contacts - World Future Policy Award

Miriam Petersen

M: miriam.petersen@ext.worldfuturecouncil.org

T: +(0)353-894826484

Senior Programme Officer

Samia Kassid

M: samia.kassid@worldfuturecouncil.org 

T: +49 (0) 40 3070914-0

About the World Future Policy Award 2025

https://www.worldfuturecouncil.org/p/living-in-harmony-with-nature-and-future-generations/

About the World Future Policy Award

The World Future Policy Award celebrates top policy solutions for us and generations to come. We raise global awareness for exemplary laws and policies, accelerating policy action toward a common future, where every person lives in dignity on a healthy, sustainable planet. Each year we focus on one topic where progress is particularly urgent and receive nominations from across the globe. 

About the World Future Council

www.worldfuturecouncil.org 

The World Future Council envisions a healthy planet with just and peaceful societies, both now and in the future. We are dedicated to identifying, developing, and promoting future-just solutions to the most pressing challenges humanity faces today. Founded in 2007 by Jakob von Uexkull, creator of the Alternative Nobel Prize, the Council is composed of 50 eminent global changemakers from civil society, science, politics, and business, who convene annually at the World Future Forum. 

Detailed Policy Information

Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act (2017)

By conferring a legal personality to the river, the Te Awa Tupua Act reflects the deep ancestral relationship the Whanganui Iwi (tribes) have with the sacred waterway and gives them legal means to protect it. The Act affirms the river as a living, indivisible entity. The Ruruku Whakatupua 2014 and the Te Awa Tupua Act 2017 are both crucial documents related to the legal recognition and protection of the Whanganui River. While the Ruruku Whakatupua 2014 is the settlement agreement that laid the groundwork for the legal recognition of the Whanganui River, the Te Awa Tupua Act 2017 is the legislative enactment that formalised this recognition and provided the river with legal personhood. This is closely linked to the colonisation of Aotearoa New Zealand by the British and the subsequent conflicts and wars in the 19th century. It is enacted to resolve long-standing Treaty grievances and reflects a respect of the Crown for Māori worldviews and integrates Māori principles into New Zealand’s legal framework. It establishes innovative model of co-governance—embodied by the dual office of Te Pou Tupua—bridging Western statutory law and tikanga and for the first time Indigenous peoples and the government or the Crown have entered a partnership to protect the natural environment for the benefit of present and future generations. The steps taken to implement the Act, e.g. Te Pūwaha (revitalisation of the Port of Whanganui) shows that the Whanganui model should be understood as an Indigenous law model, not only a rights of Nature model.

Austria: Environmental Ombudsoffice of Tyrol (Tiroler Umweltanwaltschaft) (1991/2005)

The Environmental Ombudsoffice of Tyrol (Tiroler Umweltanwaltschaft) is an institutionalised Environmental Ombudsperson mandated to represent Nature and the public interest in environmental protection matters in Tyrol, Austria. Introduced originally in the 1990s and legally embedded in the Tiroler Naturschutzgesetz 2005, the Ombudsoffice serves as an independent body participating in official approval procedures concerning environmental impact and informing and advising citizens. It acts as a bridge between civil society and construction entrepreneurs, ensuring ecological concerns are factored into land use, infrastructure, and conservation planning. Its innovative outreach and participatory programmes, such as Citizen Biotopes and youth engagement projects, exemplify democratic, inclusive approaches to fostering a culture of living in harmony with Nature and Future Generations. The underlying future vision is grounded in the philosophy of interconnectedness and respect towards all life forms, not limited to humans. Central motivation lies in redefining the relationship between humans and their environment, going beyond regulatory enforcement to foster cultural and emotional connections with Nature.

Bhutan: Biodiversity Act (2022)

The Biodiversity Act of Bhutan 2003 (amended in 2022) establishes the legal foundation for the conservation, sustainable use, and equitable sharing of the country’s biological and genetic resources. It affirms Bhutan’s rights over these resources and regulates access through enforceable mechanisms such as Prior Informed Consent, Material Transfer Agreements, and Benefit-Sharing Contracts. Administered by the National Biodiversity Centre, the Act integrates traditional knowledge and scientific governance within a rights-based framework. The 2022 amendment strengthened compliance with the Nagoya Protocol, streamlined regulatory processes, and enhanced institutional oversight.

Japan: Basic Act on Biodiversity (2008)

Enacted in 2008, Japan’s Basic Act on Biodiversity is a national legal instrument designed to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in alignment with global commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). It mandates the regular formulation and revision of national and local biodiversity strategies and introduces key principles such as coexistence with nature, intergenerational equity, and biocultural integration. Developed with strong civil society participation and broad stakeholder input, the Act consolidated fragmented biodiversity legislation into a unified and strategic framework. It uniquely combines legal mandates with traditional ecological knowledge, encourages citizen engagement, and calls for coordination across government levels and sectors, setting a precedent for participatory and adaptive biodiversity governance.

Norway: Nature Diversity Act (2009)

The Nature Diversity Act (NDA) of Norway, enacted in 2009, is a comprehensive framework governing the conservation and sustainable use of biological, geological, and landscape diversity. It replaces and consolidates earlier fragmented laws by applying uniformly across all sectors and ecosystems. The Act emphasises intergenerational equity, the intrinsic value of biodiversity, and the precautionary principle. It mandates public authorities to consider environmental impact in decision-making and incorporates Indigenous knowledge, notably that of the Sámi people. With judicial mechanisms for appeal and public participation the NDA sets high legal standards for biodiversity governance.

Panama: Law 287, which recognises the Rights of Nature and the related obligations of the State with these right (2022)

Law No 287 of 2022, formally titled “Law Recognising the Rights of Nature and the Obligations of the State Related to These Rights,” grants legal personhood to Nature within the Republic of Panama. It introduces a suite for rights for ecosystems and living beings, including the rights to exist, persist, regenerate life cycles, and be restored following harm. The law embeds ecocentric legal principles such as the precautionary approach and “in dubio pro natura”, and explicitly mandates state and citizen responsibility for safeguarding these rights. It has already been judicially enforced in high-profile environmental litigation and is shaping national discourse, legislation, and activism towards a more nature-centric governance paradigm.

South Africa: National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (NEM:BA)(2004)

NEM:BA establishes the legal framework for sonserving South Africa’s exceptional biodiversity with around 95 000 described species across nine terrestrial biomes. It creates the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and a Scientific Authority; mandates strategic tools (National Biodiversity Framework (NBF), bioregional plans, Biodiversity Management Plans (BMP)); regulates threatened and invasive species, genetically modified organisms and bioprospecting; and embeds public participation, cooperative governance, and intergenerational equity. It aligns national practice with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) while explicitly rooting biodiversity management in section 24 of the Constitution.

Spain: Law 19/2022 Granting Mar Menor and its basin status of a legal person (2022)

Law 19/2022 grants legal personality to the Mar Menor Lagoon and its basin, recognising the ecosystem as a subject of rights. The law includes the right to exist, evolve naturally, be protected, conserved, and restored. Articles 3 and 4 of the law assign legal guardianship and representation for the Lagoon to Public Administration, with support from the local community and establishes three participatory governance bodies: a Committee of Representatives, a Monitoring Commission, and a Scientific Committee. This legal framework aims to halt ecological degradation caused by decades of pollution from agriculture, mining, and tourism, and enables any person or organisation, national or international, to bring legal action in defence of the lagoon. The law marks a legal paradigm shift from anthropocentric to ecocentric jurisprudence and aligns with broader movements for the rights of Nature and protection of future generations. It challenges the historically human-centered approach of environmental law, enabling Nature to express its own needs within legal forums. The law prioritises intergenerational equity through a dual temporal and spatial focus. It protects future generations while centering ecosystems themselves as subjects of rights. By legally acknowledging the ecosystem’s right to develop, recover, and function according to its own internal processes, the law ensures sustained environmental integrity for both present and future communities.

Uganda: The National Environment Act (2019)

The National Environment Act 2019 is Uganda’s principle legislation for environmental protection and management. It replaces the 1995 law and introduces a more comprehensive legal framework reflecting current environmental challenges and international obligations. The Act empowers the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) as the coordinating and regulatory body for all environmental activities in Uganda. It reinforces the role of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIAs), introduces strategic environmental assessments (SEAs), and outlines provisions for pollution control, sustainable use of ecosystems, biodiversity conservation, and management of hazardous substances. Notably, it recognises the rights of Nature and the duty to maintain a clean and healthy environment for current and future generations.354 Its explicit acknowledgment of  Nature’s intrinsic value and integration of environmental sustainability principles reflects a deliberate commitment to intergenerational equity

United Arab Emirates: Federal Law No. 24 of 1999 on the Protection and Development of the Environment, (1999)

Federal Law No. 24 of 1999 serves as the foundational pillar of environmental legislation in the United Arab Emirates.  As the country’s primary environmental framework law, it sets comprehensive standards for ail, water, and soil protection, mandates environmental impact assessments (EIAs), and elevates biodiversity conservation to a national priority.277 The law regulates pollution, hazardous waste, and natural resource use across emirates and aligns federal action with international conventions such as CBD, CITES, and Ramsar.278 The law creates institutional mandates for federal and emirate-level coordination and supports voluntary action, awareness campaigns, and civic responsibility in environmental matters. In practice, it has led to improved environmental awareness, protected area expansion, pollution reduction, and inter-agency coordination. It continues to serve as the legislative backbone for the UAE’s agenda and biodiversity protection efforts.279 280 It mandates national biodiversity strategies and action plans, which address both biodiversity conservation and restoration.281 The ongoing legal reform ensures it remains responsive to evolving environmental and societal challenges while keeping future generations into account.282

European Union: Nature Restoration Law (EU Regulation) (2024)

As a key element of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, the EU Nature Restoration Law aims to reverse biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation across all EU Member States. Enshrined as Regulation (EU) 2024/1991, the law mandates Member States to restore at least 20% of degraded terrestrial and marine ecosystems by 2030, with progressive targets for 2040 and 2050. It builds upon prior EU directives, particularly the Birds and Habitats Directives, and establishes a legally binding obligation to restore habitats and species. Restoration measures are required for a wide range of ecosystems including urban areas, agricultural land, rivers, peatlands, forests, and marine zones. The regulation is directly applicable in all Member States without requiring national transposition. Monitoring and enforcement are overseen by the European Commission and the European Environment Agency. The policy is deeply rooted in participatory and science-based governance, aiming for cross-sectoral coherence and long-term socio-ecological resilience. it does not explicitly refer to Earth Trusteeship, its systemic focus on ecological integrity, intergenerational equity, and the rights of nature aligns with key tenets of Earth stewardship. The law mandates protection for restored areas and requires inclusive planning processes that consider the well-being of both present and future generations.

Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, in short BBNJ Agreement, (2023)

The BBNJ Agreement is an international treaty adopted in 2023 under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It addresses the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The treaty covers four main areas: marine genetic resources and benefit-sharing; area-based management tools including marine protected areas; environmental impact assessments; and capacity building and marine technology transfer. It introduces new governance structures, promotes global cooperation, and seeks to balance ecological protection with equity and scientific advancement. The BBNJ Agreement explicitly refers to the responsibility of present generations to act as stewards of the oceans on behalf of both current and future generations. It also embeds principles such as the common heritage of humankind, the ecosystem approach, and intergenerational equity within its general provisions. Although the term “Earth Trusteeship” is not used, the spirit of trusteeship is reflected in the institutional and ethical orientation of the Agreement. The treaty reinforces duties to care for ocean ecosystems not only as resources but as entities with intrinsic value, thereby acknowledging Nature’s rights in a functional if not legalistic sense.

International: Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework GBF (2022)

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), adopted in December 2022 under the Convention on Biological Diversity, is a landmark agreement aiming to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. It sets out four long-term goals for 2050 and 23 action targets for 2030, including the global “30x30” conservation target. The Framework was developed through an inclusive process involving governments, Indigenous Peoples and local communities, scientists, and civil society. It promotes a rights-based, participatory, and science-driven approach and addresses the root causes of biodiversity loss through systemic change. Though not legally binding, the GBF has already influenced national and regional policies and includes mechanisms for monitoring, resource mobilisation, and adaptive implementation. It aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement and promotes intergenerational equity and Nature stewardship. The GBF provides a shared roadmap for transformative biodiversity governance worldwide.

Five Rights of Nature and Ecocentric Law-related Motions to be Voted Upon at Upcoming IUCN World Conservation Congress

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 16, 2025

Media Contacts:

Grant Wilson, ELC Executive Director, gwilson@earthlaw.org, 510-566-1063

Gayle Carda, ELC International Legal Counsel, gcarda@earthlaw.org, 503-312-5358

Rights of Nature Motions at the IUCN

Rights of Nature and ecocentric law-related motions are heading to the IUCN World Conservation Congress from October 9 to 15, 2025 — a crucial international event held once every four years.

After completing the online discussion period, the IUCN Motions Working Group has referred a motion drafted by Earth Law Center (ELC), Motion 067: “Living in harmony with rivers through the rights of nature and ecocentric law”, and other ecocentric law-related motions to the Members’ Assembly for live discussion and a vote during the Congress (you can read the complete working group update here). ELC’s motion has 14 co-sponsors (listed below), and special thanks are due to International Rivers for helping with this motion.

This is a pivotal moment to unite IUCN Members behind a bold vision: the Rights of Nature and ecocentric law redefine our relationship with ecosystems—from domination to respectful coexistence. 

The ecocentric law-related motions scheduled for the Members’ Assembly are: 

Motion 067:  Living in harmony with rivers through the rights of nature and ecocentric law - Proposed by ELC with 14 co-sponsors.

Motion 054 - Operationalising the rights of nature through their implementation in territories

Motion 055 - Recognition of the rights of Antarctica

Motion 056 - Advancing an ethical human-ocean relationship

Motion 070 - Integrating science, rights-based approaches and harmonious coexistence with strategies for ecological recovery

How can you help?

• Vote in support of Motions 067, 054, 055, 056 and 070 (if you are attending the Congress in person).

• Respectfully encourage other IUCN Members to do the same by sharing:

• That IUCN Res. 5.100 supports this shift toward ecocentric law; and

• Why now is the time to show IUCN that Rights of Nature and ecocentric law are key to a just, sustainable future. 

• Remote or in-person participation is possible for representatives of IUCN constituents who have fully registered for IUCN Congress. If that’s you, please join our contact group to discuss and endorse the motion’s language (during the virtual contact sessions or if you are attending the Congress in person).

Shoutout to the proponents of the other motions: Les Eco Maires, Wilderness Foundation Africa, Gallifrey Foundation, & SEO/BirdLife (who all represent larger coalitions of advocates and supporters). Earth Law Center is proud to be a co-sponsor of these important motions!

Shoutout to co-sponsors of the rivers motion (067): Community Action for Nature Conservation (Kenya), Center for Biological Diversity (USA), Asociación Ak' Tenamit (Guatemala), Corporación ECOPAR (Ecuador), Stop Ecocide International (UK), Institute for Nature Conservation in Albania (Albania), ASU Center for Biodiversity Outcomes (USA), Ecological Society of the Philippines (Philippines), Synchronicity Earth (UK), Climate Action Network Tanzania / Climate Action Network Tanzania (CAN Tanzania) (Tanzania), Environment-People-Law (Ukraine), Wetlands International (The Netherlands), Nature Conservation Centre (Doğa Koruma Merkezi Vakfi) (Türkiye), and COICA ORG (Ecuador).

“The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” to show at Climate Week NYC on Sept. 24th, Exploring Interfaith Environmentalism and the Animal Rights Movement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 12, 2025

Contacts:

Grant Wilson: gwilson@earthlaw.org

Ciara Shea: cshea@earthlaw.org

New York, NY, September 24, 2025 – Earth Law Center (ELC) will host a live showing of the 1,000-year-old story “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” at Five Angels Theater in Manhattan. The play, which follows a group of animals who take humans to court for their poor treatment, offers an artistic window onto the work of ELC and the broader Rights of Nature movement in ingraining the rights of animals and other natural entities into law.

Although the roots of “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” trace to India, Muslim scholars of a Sufi order in Iraq first wrote the story in the 10th century CE. Later, in the 14th century, the Christian king of Anjou ordered Rabbi Kalonymus ben Kalonymus to translate the Arabic version into Hebrew and Latin, and it has long been an important tale in Muslim and Jewish communities. Rabbi Anson Laytner and Rabbi Dan Bridge translated and adapted the story from Hebrew into English back in 2005, and Laytner adapted it for the theater in 2024.

Laytner and Bridge’s translation has been hailed across religious traditions. The Islamic philosopher Seyd Hossein Nassar called it a “fascinating story of enduring spiritual worth and great current significance.” It has already made its way to schools in England, music festivals in Singapore, and more. Laytner also made it the focus of his recent novel, “The Forgotten Commandment.”

Although “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” is an ancient tale, its themes are especially valuable in light of the current ecological crisis, and speak to the ways in which legal systems can be used to enact rights for animals and ecosystems. In the play, humans move to an island previously inhabited only by animals and begin to exploit the animals for their own gain. Upset by their exploitation, the animals appeal to the King of the Jinn, who oversees a trial between the humans and animals. The trial itself is the focus of the play, as animals lament the human disregard for animal life, proclaiming, “There we are in the marketplace, being chopped up and sold, and that’s us! That’s our bodies, that’s our babies!” On the other side, some of the play’s humans argue that animals are rightless entities ripe for unfettered human use, while other humans, who could be described as environmentalists, align with the animals’ arguments.

Rabbi Anson Laytner

ELC Executive Director Grant Wilson

Rabbi Laytner will speak as part of an interfaith panel after the theatrical reading during Climate Week. He celebrates the play’s interfaith approach to environmentalism, saying, “The message of this tale is shockingly contemporary, but equally surprising is its interfaith history which shows that the Abrahamic faiths all have strong teachings about how to care for other living things.

Speaking to the conflict between animal rights and human exploitation, Grant Wilson, Executive Director of Earth Law Center (ELC), describes the relevance of “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” to modern ecocentrism: “This ancient fable, over a thousand years old, mirrors the stark injustices that animals still face today: being treated as mere property and inferior to humans, both culturally and legally, with no formal rights of their own. In truth, humans are merely one small element in the vast, interconnected web of life. It’s time for our society and laws to recognize this reality.”

ELC, which is sponsoring this theatrical reading of “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity,” has played a notable role in enshrining the Rights of Nature and animal rights across the globe. Focused particularly on animal rights, along with its partner organization, The Leatherback Project, ELC urged the creation of a national law in Panama protecting sea turtles, which was passed in 2023. In the U.S., ELC and partners have advocated for the rights of rivers, forests, and Southern Resident Orcas, amongst others. There are countless related campaigns globally.

ELC’s work is part of a broader global movement to advance the Rights of Nature and the rights of specific animals. In 2008, Ecuador was the first country to add a Rights of Nature amendment to its constitution, and since then, Bolivia, Panama, Spain, Uganda, and others have also enshrined the Rights of Nature into national laws. “The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” captures the historical precedent for the broader Rights of Nature and animal rights movements.

The play “mirrors the efforts of advocates across the world to recognize and defend the rights of ecosystems and species based on the reality that all life has a right to exist,” says Wilson. “Many of the arguments that the animals make in the play are the same ones made by ‘Earth lawyers’ in the courts today as they seek to create legal frameworks that represent all life, not only humans.”

“The Animals’ Lawsuit Against Humanity” will be produced by Liv Boren and Chris Dooly of Jack & Grace Productions and will be performed on September 24th at Climate Week NYC. Liv and Chris were drawn to this project because, “at a time when the natural world is under threat, there is power and wisdom in the tales of our past. J&G is thrilled to bring this show to life with Earth Law Center at Climate Week NYC, where we have the potential to reach young minds and foster real, long-lasting change.”

For tickets, please follow this link.

---

Actors Include:

• Chris Dooly, Narrator

• KeiLyn Durrel Jones

• Erin Neufer

Interfath panel:

• Anson Laytner, speaking on Judaism

• Claudio Carvalhaes, speaking on Christianity 

• Zehra Abbas, EcoMuslim Alliance

• Isra Hirsi, Panel Moderator

Introduction from:

• Grant Wilson, Executive Director, Earth Law Center

---